Disposable income → Income hypergamy preference
As the income gap closes, strict economic hypergamy yields to educational and cultural homogamy. Incentives, not a frozen instinct.
Observational · Moderate · N=400
The association does not survive the backdoor. Usually SES, outdoor time, or healthy-user bias.
Mechanism
Fisman et al. (2006): women preferred men from affluent neighborhoods and weighted intelligence heavily. Buss (1989): women stated higher value for earning capacity. The modern reading is a bargaining-and-insurance model: when a woman's own earnings and legal protections rise, the returns to marrying 'up' in money fall and the returns to matching on class and cognition rise.
Caveats
Speed-dating is not a marriage market. Neighborhood affluence is a noisy wealth signal. We do not have an RCT of income on women's preference weights.
Effect
qualitative. Women's preference for affluent partners is real in Fisman; it is not invariant to their own income and education.
Nodes
Named confounders
Cite this page
What Causes What. “Disposable income → Income hypergamy preference.” https://whatcauseswhat.org/edges/e-income-hypergamy (atlas updated 2026-08-31).
Papers
- Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment
R. Fisman, S. S. Iyengar, E. Kamenica, I. Simonson · 2006 · Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
D. M. Buss · 1989 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences